very slow writing erase operation failed

Here you can ask technical questions about REVELPROG-IS and device/memory programming.
Post Reply
verkkotalo
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 1:37 pm

very slow writing erase operation failed

Post by verkkotalo »

Hi
After update coming problems
Reading fine working
very slow writing
v. 1.9
and erase operation failed
Chip 25. 016
Please help
Attachments
54353.JPG
54353.JPG (19.04 KiB) Viewed 11425 times
hyht.JPG
hyht.JPG (28.25 KiB) Viewed 11425 times
34354.JPG
34354.JPG (24.96 KiB) Viewed 11425 times
ArT
Posts: 1603
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:54 am
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: very slow writing erase operation failed

Post by ArT »

Which chip is it exactly? You have select Byte Program (very slow)
Please select 25..016 [PP] (page program)
verkkotalo
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 1:37 pm

Re: very slow writing erase operation failed

Post by verkkotalo »

25q16dv
ArT
Posts: 1603
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:54 am
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: very slow writing erase operation failed

Post by ArT »

Please select FLASH -> 25 series -> WINBOND -> W25Q16DV
verkkotalo
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 1:37 pm

Re: very slow writing erase operation failed

Post by verkkotalo »

Same :-(
Attachments
nbvcbvbn.JPG
nbvcbvbn.JPG (143.9 KiB) Viewed 11421 times
ArT
Posts: 1603
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:54 am
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: very slow writing erase operation failed

Post by ArT »

Ok, please reply for few questions so we can find where is the issue:

1. What is CHIP ID? (Tools -> Read ID)
2. Does every read have the same checksum or every read checksum is different?
3. Does programmer pass hardware test? (tools -> hardware test)
4. Do you programming in adapter or in external circuit?
5. Any differnce when you decrease programming speed? (View -> HW Toolbar -> SCK 50% or 10%)
6. Any difference when you increase slightly voltage? (e.g. 3.0V or 3.3V)
verkkotalo
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 1:37 pm

Re: very slow writing erase operation failed

Post by verkkotalo »

1) picture
2) different
3) Pic
4) Via Clips
5) No
6) 3.3V ok picture
Attachments
fdfhkl.JPG
fdfhkl.JPG (19.91 KiB) Viewed 11420 times
jhk87.JPG
jhk87.JPG (37.52 KiB) Viewed 11420 times
12432435.JPG
12432435.JPG (37.84 KiB) Viewed 11420 times
ArT
Posts: 1603
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:54 am
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: very slow writing erase operation failed

Post by ArT »

verkkotalo wrote:1) picture
2) different
3) Pic
4) Via Clips
5) No
6) 3.3V ok picture
Ok here is solution:
-> If you are programming in external circuit - you have bus conflict (every read is different) - you need to disable other SPI communication in circuit to avoid bus conflict or desolder the chip and programm it in adapter
- >If you programming on clip only (wires + clip only) - it's not proper way - it will not work, wires are to long, to much noise. You need to use external adapter.

Hardware test also seems not ok for buffer #4. Do you removed any connections to memory (any device or adapter should NOT be connected during hardware test). It's not so bad (it still may work), but it's not fine (consumption should be <10mA for every buffer)
verkkotalo
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 1:37 pm

Re: very slow writing erase operation failed

Post by verkkotalo »

Nothing is connected for the test. Is this a warranty case?
Everything worked fine before the update.
ArT
Posts: 1603
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:54 am
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: very slow writing erase operation failed

Post by ArT »

Buffers can not be damaged by update - they can be damaged only in case of short circuit / overcurrent (e.g. during programming in external circuit with wrong connections). You can downgrade to v1.8.5 (install v1.8.5 connect programmer and click CTRL + ALT + SHIFT + A) and then make hardware test but results will be the same.
Post Reply